Dr. MH. Nekoofar

DDS, MSc, DoIBoE, PhD

Tag: ProRoot MTA

  • Dental Pulp Response to RetroMTA after Partial Pulpotomy in Permanent Human Teeth

    Abstract

    Introduction: A lack of information exists regarding the efficacy of RetroMTA (BioMTA, Seoul, Korea) directly applied on the pulp in vital pulp therapy. This study was designed to examine the clinical efficacy of RetroMTA compared with ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK) for partial pulpotomy.

    Methods: Partial pulpotomy was performed in 22 healthy human maxillary and mandibular third molars planned for extraction. The teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 11) and underwent partial pulpotomy with RetroMTA and ProRoot MTA as the control. The teeth were then restored with glass ionomer cement. Clinical and electric pulp tests were performed after 1 and 8 weeks. The teeth were radiographed and extracted at 8 weeks. Histologic sections were prepared and analyzed for pulp inflammation and dentinal bridge formation. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.

    Results: Clinical examination after 1 and 8 weeks showed no sensitivity to heat, cold, or palpation in the ProRoot MTA and RetroMTA groups. Periapical radiographs taken before the extraction of teeth showed no evidence of periapical pathology. Electric pulp testing revealed no sensitivity. Data comparisons using the Mann-Whitney U test showed no significant difference between the materials with regard to the pulp inflammation type, intensity and extension (P = .3), or bridge continuity (P = .12). However, these data revealed a significant difference between the 2 materials in pulp morphology (P < .05) and bridge thickness (P < .01).

    Conclusions: This is the first work to evaluate a RetroMTA histologic outcome in partial pulpotomy in human permanent teeth. It shows pulp disorganization, an absence of inflammation, and discontinuous mineralization, which may represent a potential drawback with RetroMTA in this indication.

    Keywords: Partial pulpotomy; ProRoot MTA; RetroMTA; permanent human teeth; vital pulp therapy.

     Dental Pulp Response to RetroMTA after Partial Pulpotomy in Permanent Human Teeth.pdf

  • Human Pulp Responses to Partial Pulpotomy Treatment with TheraCal as Compared with Biodentine and ProRoot MTA: A Clinical Trial

    Abstract

    Introduction: Questions exist regarding the efficacy of resin-containing materials such as TheraCal directly applied on the pulp. This study sought to investigate the clinical efficacy of TheraCal as compared with Biodentine and ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) for partial pulpotomy.

    Methods: In this clinical trial, partial pulpotomy was performed for 27 sound human maxillary and mandibular third molars scheduled for extraction. The teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 9) and underwent partial pulpotomy with TheraCal, Biodentine, and ProRoot MTA. The teeth were then restored with glass ionomer cement. Clinical and electric pulp tests were performed after 1 and 8 weeks. The teeth were radiographed and extracted at 8 weeks. Histologic sections were prepared and analyzed for pulp inflammation and dentinal bridge formation. Data were analyzed by using one-way analysis of variance.

    Results: Clinical examination showed no sensitivity to heat, cold, or palpation in ProRoot MTA and Biodentine groups. Two patients in TheraCal group (20%) reported significant pain at 1 week. Periapical radiographs showed no periapical pathology, and electric pulp test revealed a normal pulp response with no hypersensitivity. Inflammation was absent with all materials at 8 weeks. Normal pulp organization was seen in 33.33% of the teeth in ProRoot MTA, 11.11% in TheraCal, and 66.67% in Biodentine group (P = .06). Biodentine group showed complete dentinal bridge formation in all teeth, whereas this rate was 11% and 56% in TheraCal and ProRoot MTA groups, respectively (P = .001).

    Conclusions: Overall, Biodentine and MTA performed better than TheraCal when used as partial pulpotomy agent and presented the best clinical outcomes.

    Keywords: Biodentine, partial pulpotomy, ProRoot MTA, TheraCal.

     Human Pulp Responses to Partial Pulpotomy Treatment with TheraCal as Compared with Biodentine and ProR.pdf

  • Acid and Microhardness of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate–like Materials

    The aim of this study was to compare the surface microhardness of BioAggregate, ProRoot MTA, and CEMCement when exposed to an acidic environment or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as a synthetic tissue fluid. Methods: Ninety cylindrical molds made of polymethyl methacrylate with an internal diameter of 6 mm and height of 4 mm (according to ASTM E384 standard for microhardness tests) were fabricated and filled with BioAggregate (n = 30), tooth-colored ProRoot MTA (n = 30), or CEM Cement (n = 30). Each group was then divided into 3 subgroups of 10 specimens consisting of those exposed to distilled water, exposed to PBS (pH = 7.4), or exposed to butyric acid (pH = 5.4). After 1 week the Vickers surface microhardness test was performed. Statistical analysis included 2-way analysis of variance, followed by post hoc Dunnett T3 in cases with lack of homoscedasticity and Tukey honestly significant difference in cases with homoscedasticity. 
    Results: The indentations obtained from the CEM Cement specimens exposed to an acidic pH were not readable because of incomplete setting. There was a significant difference between the microhardness of the materials regardless of the environmental conditions (P < .001). In all the environmental conditions, MTA had significantly higher and CEM Cement had significantly lower microhardness values (P < .001). All experimental cements had significantly higher microhardness values when exposed to PBS (P < .001) and had significantly lower microhardness values when exposed to butyric acid (P < .001). Conclusions: The surface microhardness of BioAggregate, ProRoot MTA, and CEM Cement was reduced significantly by exposure to butyric acid and increased significantly by exposure to PBS. In all environmental conditions, MTA had significantly higher microhardness values. (J Endod 2014;40:432–435)

     Acid and Microhardness of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate.pdf

  • Effect of Acid Etching Procedures on the Compressive Strength of 4 Calcium Silicate–based Endodontic Cements

    The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of acid etching on the compressive strength of 4 calcium silicate–based cements. Methods: One gram of each corresponding powder of ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Johnson City, TN), MTA Angelus (Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil), and CEM cement (BioniqueDent, Tehran, Iran) and a 0.33-g aliquot of liquid were placed in a plastic mixing capsule that was then mechanically mixed for 30 seconds at 4500 rpm in an amalgamator. For the preparation of Biodentine (Septodont, Saint Maur-des-Fosses, France), the liquid provided was added to the powder within the plastic capsule supplied by the manufacturer and then mechanically mixed for 30 seconds at 4500 rpm using the amalgamator. The resulting slurries were then placed incrementally into 40 cylindrical molds to give a total of 160 specimens that were incubated at 37C for a week. Twenty specimens of each material were then subjected to the acid etch procedure. The compressive strength of the samples was then calculated in megapascals using a universal testing machine. The results were then subjected to 2-way analysis of variance analysis of variance followed by the Tukey post hoc test.
    Results: The application of acid etch significantly reduced (P < .0001) the compressive strength of Angelus MTA and CEM cement; however, it did not reduce the compressive strength of ProRoot MTA or Biodentine. Regardless of the acid etch application, Biodentine showed significantly higher compressive strength values than the other materials (P < .0001), whereas CEM cement had the lowest compressive strength values. There was no significant differenc between CEM cement and MTA Angelus. The compressive strength of ProRoot MTA was significantly lower (P < .0001) than Biodentine but significantly higher (P <.0001) than MTA Angelus and CEM cement in both  the test and control groups. Conclusions: When the application of acid etchants is required, Biodentine and ProRoot MTA seem to be better options than MTA Angelus or CEM cement. (J Endod 2013;39:1646–1648)

     Effect of Acid Etching Procedures on the Compressive.pdf